Quote:
|
Originally Posted by manco82
It doesn't matter if Tiger doesn't "feel superior" if he finishes at 18 majors. Objective historians will examine the records and notice that aside from # majors won, Tiger holds every record that indicates dominance, like winning %, money/event, consecutive cuts, winning margins in majors, the Tiger Slam etc...
|
You woefully lack historical golf knowledge.
First and foremost, money has absolutely nothing to do with dominating anything golf related.
"Objective Historians" Now there's a group you have no chance of ever becoming a member of!
I looked in every "Record Book" I have and I can't seem to find a Dominance Section in any of them.
Your Tiger scrapbook may be the only place to find such a thing.
