Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lefty
Looking at the field, less than half of the players are American ,with only Els and Clarke as potential winners missing from the field. The format of the event looks sound but why such a small field? 70 is too small a number. Surely the top 100 on the World rankings ,followed by 20 slots for the 'smaller ' tours outside USA and Europe wouldmake it a bigger and better tournament.
Maybe its the lack of a cut that ensures evryone turns up?
|
The thinking is probably; the smaller the field the higher the quality of the competition. The underlying pricinciple of the WCG is to get the best players in the world together. I think number of players is desigh to add to the "exclusivity" of the event.