View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old September 11th, 2006, 04:13 PM
rodney_c rodney_c is offline
Grand Slam
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Ireland, and from a suitcase
Posts: 2,179
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texas Wedge
I'd actually like to see that. Wouldn't it say a lot if Tiger only played two days and shot further under par than any of the ladies? Obviously it would never happen, but it does make you think.
Obviously that would work at the US Womens Open, because the winning score was level par.
So Tiger would be a big favourite to win with 2 rounds of play.

However at the Wendy's where Lorena had:
67 68 64 65 for -24.

That would mean Tiger would have to have 2 rounds of 60 to tie her, and there isn't much chance he would do that.

He wouldn't have a huge advantage on par 3 holes. It isn't easy to get a birdie on an lpga par 3 hole.
The par 5's should play like easy par 4s for him. So he would get some birdies and some eagles.
Then the par 4's although fairly easy, it's not like her could drive them. The odd one would be reachable, but they don't tend to set up well for driving to them. So it would be more like alot of wedges and short irons in.
He'd birdie alot, but it takes alot to get a score of -12 on any course.

Oh, and of course, it won't happen anyway.
Reply With Quote