The way things stand, there is in fact bias against men as far as golf goes. Up on the tours, women can play anywhere they like, men cannot. At club level, women are pushing for full rights which would mean that they can play any competition whilst men could not.

There is a serious difference between the men and womens game which is where I am coming from. It wouldnt need to be Tiger. I suspect that any card carrying PGA pro (male) would dominate were he allowed to play on the womens tour. I dont care what all the stats say - stats are for people who dont understand experiment - the proof is in the results and there is absolutely no proof to counter that supposition (whilst every time a woman crashes out of a mens event, the case for support strengthens).