View Single Post
  #14 (permalink)  
Old November 4th, 2004, 10:52 AM
davecenter davecenter is offline
Tournament Winner
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 896
Well, if you walked around in that sort of gear, the only logical deduction would be that you supported Nader!

People's views are obvious only to those know how to interpret the signs of them correctly. For instance, one of my best friends and I think so much alike, many times we know what the other is going to say before they say it. I know what he is thinking just by him saying a small bit. That is interpretation. However, if I did not know anything about my friend (let's assume he is a stranger), then I could never interpret him like that.

Furthermore, some people are merely unable to correctly conceal their views from others. They don't understand how to approach a subject without letting their views show. I'm one who goes both ways. On some issues (such as this one) there is no mistaking what my views are. On other issues (and League can testify to this) I don't take a clear stand on either side, and I conceal the way I really feel very well.

Hope that didn't get too deep!

Now, for the subject of ladies in the men's locker rooms.
Does anyone else feel that that is totally wrong? I'm almost positive that the women would be quite upset if there were male reporters in their locker rooms. It would be called sexual harrassment! Anyone else feel the same way?
Reply With Quote