Go Back   Golf Rewind > The Pro Shop > Golf Equipment

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old April 11th, 2007, 07:15 PM
mala mala is offline
Weekend Duffer
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 26
R7 M.O.I / forgiveness.

I've hit the r7 425 a few times and liked it alot, but a friend said I would do better with a larger headed driver as it will be more forgiving. Then someone else told me that because of the weights, it has an MOI similar to other regular shaped drivers, (not the square or long headed drivers) and is therefore just as forgiving.

who is right?
Reply With Quote
REGISTER and browse with less advertisements! It's FREE!
  #2 (permalink)  
Old April 11th, 2007, 08:01 PM
rc-combat's Avatar
rc-combat rc-combat is offline
Tournament Winner
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Tyler, TX
Posts: 572
Me personally, I had an R7 425 clone that I liked alot. Then I got an R7 460, that I could not hit over 250 yards to save my life. Now I am using an R7 Quad which is only 400cc. Frankly The big head concept dosen't work, I hit drives in the 400-425cc range better than I do the big drivers. Maybe it is a mental thing.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old April 11th, 2007, 10:38 PM
Bignose's Avatar
Bignose Bignose is offline
Green Jacket
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ames, IA
Posts: 1,167
The MOI of the square drivers are indeed higher than anything that has been made manufacturered in the last few years. There were actually some small component makers of square drivers in the late '80s. But, the square drivers have the highers MOI of anything made by the big OEMs, including the moveable weight drivers.

However, there is a law of diminishing returns when it comes to MOI. The jump from 2,000 to 3,000 (g-cm^2) was very signifcant. This was the Big Bertha era. But the jump from 3,000 to 4,000, which would be around years 2001-2002ish wasn't nearly as significant. Last year's 460cc models were around 4,300. The square models haven't quite gotten to 5,000 yet. But, the increase at this point does not really add significany playability. The manufacturer's love to claim how much better they are, but the actual facts are that as regarding the playability of the club, it isn't too big of a deal. The limit the USGA set is 5,900, but again, because of the diminishing returns, there may actually never be a driver made to the max. It just won't improve the situation that much.

Rather, you should play the driver you are most consistent with, the one you like the best. There aren't really going to be much improvement in terms of forgiveness unless the USGA changes the rules.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old April 12th, 2007, 01:23 PM
mala mala is offline
Weekend Duffer
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 26
Thanks for the comments. That backs up what i found today. I tried the superquad and the 425 at the range today and much prefered the 425! Custom fitting fit me up for regular flex and 10.5 degree. "Oh we have a 2nd hand one of those out the back" the guy said, so I now have a nearly new 425 at a great price
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
All the forgiveness in the world doesn't help grendal35 General Golf Discussion 14 July 27th, 2006 09:08 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:18 PM.