Go Back   Golf Rewind > The Clubhouse > Tour Talk

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old June 15th, 2005, 03:23 PM
Putton Putton is offline
Tournament Winner
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Cyprus
Posts: 540
Quote:
He said yesterday he feels like he's hitting good shots, better than he hit earlier this year, but he's struggling with the slower greens. He prefers the fast greens, like ones at Shinnecock and Pinehurst. It makes you wonder if Retief will play better than he has been b/c of the different greens. And Retief is one of the better Open players we have. Two titles in 4 years. I have a tough decision to make tonight.
I like Retief and wish him all the best, although I wouldn't put a bet on him given his performance in this year. Not bad, not fantastic either. Then again I wouldn't put a bet on Tiger winning the Masters, so who knows.
Putton

Last edited by ForgedRbest : June 15th, 2005 at 04:20 PM. Reason: Fixed quotes
Reply With Quote
REGISTER and browse with less advertisements! It's FREE!
  #17 (permalink)  
Old June 16th, 2005, 08:45 AM
gpickypick gpickypick is offline
Tournament Winner
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: San Fernando Valley, CA
Posts: 505
Here's a sort-of related question about this tournament and par:

If the USGA wasn't so concerned with protecting that magic number of par, why would they change the course from a par-72 for the average Joe to a par-70 for the Open? Why not just let the par-5's be par-5's? Regardless of the fact that they would be short par-5's, them doing this makes it very obvious that par is their holy grail.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old June 16th, 2005, 09:19 AM
leaguegolf leaguegolf is offline
GR Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 7,657
Quote:
Originally Posted by gpickypick
Here's a sort-of related question about this tournament and par:

If the USGA wasn't so concerned with protecting that magic number of par, why would they change the course from a par-72 for the average Joe to a par-70 for the Open? Why not just let the par-5's be par-5's? Regardless of the fact that they would be short par-5's, them doing this makes it very obvious that par is their holy grail.

Good point. They don't award the trophy based on "Par." The winner is still the player with the least number of shots. That, in itself, has nothing to do with Par.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old June 16th, 2005, 10:22 PM
stlcard_25 stlcard_25 is offline
GR Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 8,563
Even after today's first round, even is still looking very solid. Last time I think the leader after 18 was -3....by Sunday I'd be shocked if the winning score is any lower than the leading scores today (in relation to par, of course).
Reply With Quote
REGISTER and browse with less advertisements! It's FREE!
Reply
Tags: , , , ,



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pretty Pings....! colourblindchameleon Golf Equipment 35 January 5th, 2007 05:23 PM
good week long golf school in alabama area tlsmith22 South 1 November 13th, 2006 11:05 AM
What's a good job to get if you want to golf a few times a week? guywatchinggolf General Golf Discussion 22 September 3rd, 2006 08:05 PM
Pretty Flowers? leaguegolf Fun & Games 3 January 26th, 2005 12:52 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:02 AM.