FACTOID: There have only been three repeat winners in the history of The Masters since 1934 -- Nicklaus (1965 & 1966), Faldo (1989 & 1990) and Woods (2001 & 2002)....just thought I'd add that one....
As long as Tiger is in contention at any of the Majors we all win. And if one of the other "Big 5" are up there, well that's just gravy(on leagues winning meal)
As long as Tiger is in contention at any of the Majors we all win. And if one of the other "Big 5" are up there, well that's just gravy(on leagues winning meal)
It's Golf-a-holic that will be needing the gravy......and the ketchup and whatever else it takes to choke down the crow that he'll be "dining" on!
You've just illustrated that Tiger is certainly capable of repeating. I appreciate the encouragement!
Yes, he's capable as well as all the other previous winners who tried to repeat...they were all capable, but did they succeed? No, they didn't. Capable is a powerful word isn't it? I'm capable of scoring well the next time I tee it up, does that mean that I'll succeed? All depends I guess. I think capable is a good choice of words here League, but I think you'd be happier if you could say likely and feel good about it.
As I've indicated before only 3 times in the history of the tournament which is 72 years old...if you consider that encouragement, I think you either have a great attitude or actually are really a hopeful individual. I know a good bit of players who are capable of winning the Masters this year...out of the Top 5 we've been talking about is obviously Chris DiMarco, Furyk, Luke Donald, Mike Weir, David Toms....
Yes, he's capable as well as all the other previous winners who tried to repeat...they were all capable, but did they succeed? No, they didn't. Capable is a powerful word isn't it? I'm capable of scoring well the next time I tee it up, does that mean that I'll succeed? All depends I guess. I think capable is a good choice of words here League, but I think you'd be happier if you could say likely and feel good about it.
As I've indicated before only 3 times in the history of the tournament which is 72 years old...if you consider that encouragement, I think you either have a great attitude or actually are really a hopeful individual. I know a good bit of players who are capable of winning the Masters this year...out of the Top 5 we've been talking about is obviously Chris DiMarco, Furyk, Luke Donald, Mike Weir, David Toms....
You misunderstood my use of the word "capable." Tiger has shown he is more than capable because he's actually done it, and recently. That fact alone should give you reason to worry. The Masters and Tiger are a natural fit. Face it, it's Tiger's tournament to lose. If he plays reasonably well he'll be donning another green jacket and I'll be making reservations!
All the others you mentioned are capable too.....capable of being in the same position you are........in the rear view mirror!
January 18th, 2006, 05:09 PM
Linear Mode
Similar Threads
