Go Back   Golf Rewind > The Clubhouse > Tour Talk

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old March 14th, 2006, 11:49 PM
droogy33's Avatar
droogy33 droogy33 is offline
Tournament Winner
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA USA
Posts: 945
Jack Is Dead Wrong

So Jack Nicklaus thinks that lengthening Augusta National is eliminating the number of players who have a "realistic" chance of winning?

Did not short-hitting Mike Weir win The Masters in 2003? And was not short-hitting Len Mattiace runner-up?

Chris DiMarco finished runner-up last year while Luke Donald was third. And Jim Furyk, who is currently ranked 177th on TOUR in driving distance, would never be counted out by any pundit.

When will folks like Nicklaus and Nick Price learn?
Reply With Quote
REGISTER and browse with less advertisements! It's FREE!
  #2 (permalink)  
Old March 15th, 2006, 12:12 AM
leaguegolf leaguegolf is offline
N/A
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 7,657
I guess they'll learn when a short hitter wins on the new, longer Augusta National.

It will be interesting to see how the old girl plays this year. I tend to believe most of what Jack, Arnie, and Nick have to say about golf. It would be interesting to take all the weekend player's driving averages, average them, and see who does better. I know Augusta has always favored the long hitter but I think Jack, Arnie, and Nick's point is that with the latest changes Augusta is favoring the long hitters even more so.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old March 15th, 2006, 12:31 AM
stlcard_25 stlcard_25 is offline
N/A
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 8,560
I was just reading an article on Tiger Woods' website about him sneaking up to play a practice round at Augusta. Although the course wasn't in tournament shape yet (Tiger said the greens were running about an 11 on the stimp), he managed a 2-under 70 on the track. Amongst the highlights...Tiger came up short of the 4th green with a 3 iron. This means that possibly the longest hitter in the field (depending on if Holmes, Daly or Watson make it...there are others ahead in the stats but only those three are truly in Tiger's league off the tee) will be hitting a fairway wood into that par 3. What will a guy like David Toms have to hit? Also, on #15, Tiger hit his best drive of the day and reached the green with a 5 iron. This is in line with what the longest hitters were hitting into 15 in the mid-'80s, so it appears Hootie and company have accomplished their objective of keeping guys from making it a driver-wedge hole.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old March 15th, 2006, 01:50 AM
LordEmery's Avatar
LordEmery LordEmery is offline
Green Jacket
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,204
Whatever Jack says, I believe.

2 antennas on a roof met, fell in love, and got married. The wedding ceremony wasn't much, but the reception was excellent.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old March 15th, 2006, 04:16 AM
buns buns is offline
Green Jacket
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Belfast, Ireland
Posts: 1,425
I see logic in Jack's words. Just because a short hitter can compete, doesnt necesarrily mean it isnt playing into the hands of the longer hitters. Stats cannot easily back up any arguement here, you just have to use logic.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old March 15th, 2006, 04:34 AM
TwillDog's Avatar
TwillDog TwillDog is offline
Tournament Winner
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 643
And by "realistic", I'm guessing the intent is to say under normal circumstances. Fred Funk has game, but is taken out of so many courses just because he can't realistically think about birdie on several par 4's. To say that if Tiger is on his game and Funk is playing his best he'd still lose is obvious because Tiger is better all around anyway, but even some golfers of less ability with more length could compete with a Funk type golfer.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old March 15th, 2006, 04:50 AM
Lefty's Avatar
Lefty Lefty is offline
Grand Slam
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,071
If it rains, I think Jack will be proved right , as there will be no roll for the shorter hitters.Hitting four iron and higher intot he tricky greens will be tough.

If the fairways are firm and roll , then the shorter hitters will be in touch.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old March 15th, 2006, 06:09 AM
Putton Putton is offline
Tournament Winner
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Cyprus
Posts: 540
Quote:
If it rains, I think Jack will be proved right , as there will be no roll for the shorter hitters.Hitting four iron and higher intot he tricky greens will be tough.

If the fairways are firm and roll , then the shorter hitters will be in touch.
I would have thought that if it rains and the greens are more receptive the short hitters would have a better chance because it would be easier to get the ball close with a long iron.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old March 15th, 2006, 07:27 AM
Lefty's Avatar
Lefty Lefty is offline
Grand Slam
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,071
Quote:
there will be no roll
This will be a bigger factor
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old March 15th, 2006, 07:45 AM
Simp's Avatar
Simp Simp is offline
Tournament Winner
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Central New Jersey Exit 7A
Posts: 851
It always rains leading up to The Masters.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old March 15th, 2006, 08:51 AM
mr3856a's Avatar
mr3856a mr3856a is offline
Grand Slam
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Staatsburg, NY
Posts: 2,593
Send a message via AIM to mr3856a Send a message via Yahoo to mr3856a
Read the article in this week's Golf Digest. Jack isn't concerned ONLY about the length of the course, but the larger bunkers, the limited landing areas.

His basic argument was that Bobby Jones wanted you to have plenty of landing area and be able to put the ball in various places on the fairway and have different routes to the hole. Jack said that a lot of the changes to Augusta have limited those options, and that is his main concern, not necessarily the distance.

And for the record, saying "When will folks like Nicklaus and Nick Price learn?" earns a poster one of these
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old March 15th, 2006, 09:01 AM
Crizgolfer Crizgolfer is offline
Golf Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 39
This is a tricky one. There are valid arguments on both sides of this issue. Personally, I like watching a long drive, but I LOVE watching a great approach shot.

This is one of the top tournaments in PROFESSIONAL golf, thus it should be one of the toughest. Let's face it the game is changing. The equipment has improved and since Tiger came along so has the conditioning of the players. Now, golfers train like athletes. I think this has added a lot to golf at the professional level.

More and more of the young players are long hitters and more are on the way. Call this the Tiger legacy. These players have a distinct advantage, because they can play driver & wedge on a lot of holes. Changing the course so they will be required to use more mid-iron approach shots makes the game a bit more difficult for these guys. That is the side of the argument that says they are adding skill requirement to the tournament. You may hit it long, but you will still have a tough approach shot.

The tough thing is that if you can't hit it long, well, you will probably really struggle on these holes now. Long iron and fairway wood approach shots are tough. Especially on greens like these.

They have made the changes. The game has changed and now we will need to see what happens after a few seasons. This is PROFESSIONAL golf and it should be tough and it should reward the best overall player. The guy that is long off the tee AND can hit solid mid-iron approaches is the better player.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old March 15th, 2006, 09:11 AM
andy804's Avatar
andy804 andy804 is offline
Tournament Winner
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 606
The best player for the week will win the Masters. It will take accurate irons (whether it is a long iron or short iron), great short game (especially putting) and taking advantage of opportunities, when presented.

The good news is that 15 will demand a "go vs no-go" decision and some have the length to make it worth going for. This hole was definitely improved.

I think the fairway bunkers and length will put an extra thought into the driver's mind, and this is a good thing. Accuracy is still rewarded. See Luke D, Jim F, and Chris D last year.

By the way, we all seem to forget that David Toms won a PGA hitting a 5 wood into a Par 3 for an incredible ace. I would expect that most players will be hitting a 5 wood into the 4th hole. They can always move the tee up, if the conditions warrant it.

Let's wait a few years to judge how the course performs. Jack may be correct, but he should be more cautionary in his course comments.

I personally think he is a little miffed that he does not get consulted with the changes. He even attacks Fazio in his rant.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old March 15th, 2006, 09:11 AM
EDSGolf's Avatar
EDSGolf EDSGolf is offline
Tournament Winner
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 755
Grow the rough, add some bunkers in long distance landing areas and sabotage Tiger's golf bag and the rest of the PGA tour may have a chance.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old March 15th, 2006, 12:30 PM
stlcard_25 stlcard_25 is offline
N/A
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 8,560
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lefty
If it rains, I think Jack will be proved right , as there will be no roll for the shorter hitters.Hitting four iron and higher intot he tricky greens will be tough.

If the fairways are firm and roll , then the shorter hitters will be in touch.
If it's firm and fast, they'll still be hitting longer irons into greens that are very springy and not able to hold as well. I tend to think rainy conditions are what has allowed the shorter hitters a shot at the thing the last few years. Give Tiger 8 and 9 irons into the greens and Luke Donald 5 and 6 irons in and Luke would be hard pressed to keep pace if the turf is bouncy.
Reply With Quote
REGISTER and browse with less advertisements! It's FREE!
Reply
Tags: , ,



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Take Dead Aim ... billybogey5 1/2 General Golf Discussion 4 November 26th, 2006 07:27 PM
Tiger comes in Dead-Last jimmigan Tour Talk 31 October 12th, 2006 03:59 PM
Dead last... mr3856a Tour Talk 99 September 12th, 2006 02:48 PM
Dead/Rules 76bearsfly General Golf Discussion 8 June 16th, 2005 01:06 AM
Back from the dead... colourblindchameleon The Lounge 12 November 29th, 2004 03:44 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:44 PM.