What about Charlie 3 sticks? He's an Augusta native with plenty of game and distance. Only has one PGA win to date and shot +20 to BARELY miss the cut this year! Only Charles Coody who's like 300 years old had a higher two round score +24.
What about Charlie 3 sticks? He's an Augusta native with plenty of game and distance. Only has one PGA win to date and shot +20 to BARELY miss the cut this year! Only Charles Coody who's like 300 years old had a higher two round score +24.
Actually, Howell had a two day score of 164 (80-84) while Coody (89-74) had 163. Howell was alone in last.
I'm sorry, GF, but I have never read or heard any respectable or serious golf writer, pundit or analyst make that contention.
As BillyBogey5 said, the media. I should have clarified it. The media acts like they represent everyone. Of course, the Fair weather golf fans who are only into superstars.
3. Garcia, Scott, Harrington (probably best players not to win a major thus far)?
Paddy Harrington is by far a more successful player on tour than Garcia OR Scott. I think Sergio is more hype than anything else, and Scott is the same. Paddy has been performing day in and day out. So to group Sergio and Scott amongst Paddy is a blow to Paddy.
Without a doubt Sergio is a great player. I just want to see him win a bit more and be in the hunt a bit more often. Adam Scott will never win a Major.
Paddy Harrington is by far a more successful player on tour than Garcia OR Scott. I think Sergio is more hype than anything else, and Scott is the same. Paddy has been performing day in and day out. So to group Sergio and Scott amongst Paddy is a blow to Paddy.
Except that both Sergio and Adam have more wins and a higher WGR than Paddy.
April 16th, 2006, 05:40 PM
Only Charles Coody who's like 300 years old had a higher two round score +24.
Linear Mode
Similar Threads
