June 10th, 2007, 04:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Masters PGA Winners Qualification
With the new qualifications for winners, the Masters may have more people than they want.
1. Maybe they should do PGA winners (excluing opposite field, but including fall finish), but they have to finish in the top 40/50 by end of the year or if they win in 2008, be in top 10/15 by the final selection period. It allows some latitude for tour winners, but gets rid of fluke winners like Chris Couch. 2. Other ideas.. a. Get rid of the top 50 World rankings as of Dec. 31, 2007 (keep the one for 2008) and maybe use order of Merit earnings. b. Get rid of either the Fed Ex participants for Tour Championshipor top 30 money list at end of the year. The lists will be similar, but not totally alike (be a few extra). I prefer get rid of the former (Fed Ex) 
|
| REGISTER and browse with less advertisements! It's FREE! |
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Changes in Masters Qualification? | Golf Fanatic | Tour Talk | 15 | April 23rd, 2007 10:24 PM |
| New Masters Qualification Criteria | Golf Fanatic | Tour Talk | 26 | April 18th, 2006 11:49 PM |
| Masters Winners Questions | Golf Fanatic | Tour Talk | 9 | April 18th, 2006 12:15 AM |
| Time to change the MAsters qualification criteria | Lefty | Tour Talk | 127 | April 9th, 2006 11:51 AM |
| No-Name Winners | droogy33 | Tour Talk | 11 | June 20th, 2005 06:20 PM |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:49 AM.
