Go Back   Golf Rewind > The Clubhouse > Tour Talk

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old February 24th, 2008, 03:33 PM
bingdawg's Avatar
bingdawg bingdawg is offline
Q-School
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Montana
Posts: 226
Is there really a need for a consolation match ?

I mean, both these guys are coming off match play losses... They only show them on TV to kill time it seems. Why not let them fly home a day early?
Reply With Quote
REGISTER and browse with less advertisements! It's FREE!
  #2 (permalink)  
Old February 24th, 2008, 04:10 PM
straightshooter's Avatar
straightshooter straightshooter is offline
Grand Slam
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: MA-USA
Posts: 2,496
Re: Is there really a need for a consolation match ?

Probably an insurance policy to add to the content for TV coverage, like you mentioned. The main match might be a blowout and end early, while the consolation match might be more interesting. The main match might have players in them that fans don't care about. If Tiger had lost yesterday, we'd be seeing a lot of it.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old February 24th, 2008, 04:36 PM
Bignose's Avatar
Bignose Bignose is online now
Green Jacket
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ames, IA
Posts: 1,046
Re: Is there really a need for a consolation match ?

It's also a difference of $100,000 and 525 FedEx points. I guess if you didn't care about either, you could just concede the consolation match and go home.

But, give me the consolation match -- do you really want to see commercials every time they cut to the 3rd place match? It's also not like these guys don't like to play, I always like to play the 3rd place match in any tournament I lost in the semis in.

Is it really necessary? Probably not, but it also isn't like it is really hurting anything or taking anything away from the championship match.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old February 24th, 2008, 06:41 PM
TheRookie TheRookie is offline
Weekend Duffer
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Riverside,CA
Posts: 8
Re: Is there really a need for a consolation match ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by straightshooter View Post
Probably an insurance policy to add to the content for TV coverage, like you mentioned. The main match might be a blowout and end early, while the consolation match might be more interesting. The main match might have players in them that fans don't care about. If Tiger had lost yesterday, we'd be seeing a lot of it.
By the way, wasn't the finals match a blow out? They just need to cut down the final match to 18 instead of 36. You don't need that many holes to show you dominate. Cink didn't even come close to making it a match in the first place. The consolation match was way more intresting than the final too!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old February 24th, 2008, 08:23 PM
johnny trance johnny trance is offline
Tournament Winner
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 551
Re: Is there really a need for a consolation match ?

the players HATE the consolation match and i don't blame them. its a waste of everyone's time.

get rid of it!

there were actually two consolation macthes today. lol
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old February 25th, 2008, 07:01 AM
dieter dieter is offline
Tournament Winner
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Orange, CT.
Posts: 623
Re: Is there really a need for a consolation match ?

Of course they need the consolation match - it determines 3rd place.....and there's money and FedEx points at stake as well. I do agree that the final should be 18 holes rather than 36 though.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old February 25th, 2008, 12:02 PM
Samsonite Samsonite is offline
Weekend Duffer
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 15
Re: Is there really a need for a consolation match ?

I've always wondered about the length of the match as well. Trying to watch it yesterday, I was bored even though Tiger is ridiculously good. Partly because it was a blowout, but also because I knew the length of the match. 36 holes, 6 hours-or-so of golf. Come on. Even if it was close, I would be less interested. It's like the baseball/basketball season - shorten it and everyone will start caring from moment one. There's more to lose with each hole.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old February 25th, 2008, 03:02 PM
BPC's Avatar
BPC BPC is offline
Tournament Winner
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 633
Re: Is there really a need for a consolation match ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by dieter View Post
Of course they need the consolation match - it determines 3rd place.....and there's money and FedEx points at stake as well.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old February 25th, 2008, 08:09 PM
straightshooter's Avatar
straightshooter straightshooter is offline
Grand Slam
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: MA-USA
Posts: 2,496
Re: Is there really a need for a consolation match ?

I think that I have found a perfectly entertaining solution.

Nobody goes home until Sunday evening. The full field plays all rounds until all golfers are sorted from 1st place down to 64th place.

Example: In a field of just 8 golfers, it would work like this:

The winners of the first match will end up in one group, that will make up places 1-4. The losers of the first match will end up in another group, that will make up places 5-8.

The winners of the first match that won their second match will fight for place 1-2. The winners of the first match that lost their second match will fight for place 3-4. The losers of the first match that won their second match will fight for place 5-6. The losers of the first match that lost their second match will fight for place 7-8.

At the end of this eight-player tournament everyone will have their unique place in the tournament results:

1 WWW
2 WWL
3 WLW
4 WLL
5 LWW
6 LWL
7 LLW
8 LLL

Why does this make the tournament more interesting to watch? Because while the undefeated twosome tees off to decide the tournament winner, the worst two performers of the week will be in a hard-fought battle to come in 63rd, i.e not last. You bet that that will be a good, hard-fought match! Especially because 64th place gets no prize money. Besides that entertainment, there should be at least a few other matches on the course that might be worth watching, for whatever reason.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old February 25th, 2008, 09:20 PM
Bignose's Avatar
Bignose Bignose is online now
Green Jacket
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ames, IA
Posts: 1,046
Re: Is there really a need for a consolation match ?

However they do it, I think that there should be more matchplay in the TOUR. It is a very interesting different game than stroke play. It deserves more exposure on events that really matter (not just fighting for pride like the various Cups). I am usually not tempted to watch much golf on TV that is not a major, but I do like to watch matchplay. But, then again, I think that there should be a wide variety of different formats on the tour. I'd love to see a true scramble, or best ball, or any of the really different formats. I'd really love to see a worst-ball 2-man team tournament, or even make it just 1 person and have them play each ball twice. I'd love to see an "antique" club tournament. However, I think that these are just idle wishes, because they aren't going to happen any time soon.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old February 25th, 2008, 10:05 PM
CG8 CG8 is offline
Tour Card
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: MI
Posts: 282
Re: Is there really a need for a consolation match ?

Personally I think it is senseless
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old February 25th, 2008, 10:06 PM
straightshooter's Avatar
straightshooter straightshooter is offline
Grand Slam
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: MA-USA
Posts: 2,496
Re: Is there really a need for a consolation match ?

The worst-ball tournament would be interesting: In the interest of fair-play it would probably be wise that the opposing team decides what is the worst ball, which gives the game an extra dimension.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old February 25th, 2008, 10:10 PM
CG8 CG8 is offline
Tour Card
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: MI
Posts: 282
Re: Is there really a need for a consolation match ?

It's funny because I thought that Tiger and Stewart were only playing 18 holes on Sunday . Shows how much I know
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old March 3rd, 2008, 07:26 PM
Billyg's Avatar
Billyg Billyg is offline
Senior Golfer
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 1,648
Re: Is there really a need for a consolation match ?

It's fun because match play cuts the field in half each round. This lets there be more action on the course late in the tournament and gives viewers plenty to watch. With something like the World Match Play, I'd welcome a few more "consolation matches."
Reply With Quote
REGISTER and browse with less advertisements! It's FREE!
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Match play JungleJ General Golf Discussion 16 August 22nd, 2006 06:38 PM
Puting More Fun into the Match Billyg General Golf Discussion 0 March 6th, 2006 10:28 AM
WGC Match Play Scott1s Tour Talk 115 February 28th, 2006 03:20 PM
Surprise in my match golfshots82 General Golf Discussion 6 August 30th, 2005 09:47 PM
Avatar Consolation Winner ForgedRbest Fun & Games 12 November 28th, 2004 07:03 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:18 PM.